9BoxLive demo · seeded data
Subject

Jordan Lee

High confidenceSolid Contributor8 reviewers · 3 groups
Final score
2.31
/ 3.00

You are viewed as a steady and dependable contributor. The feedback does not indicate serious concerns, but there is an opportunity to become more distinctive by improving one or two key areas.

A / B / C player

A, irreplaceable · B, would be missed and take time to replace · C, would not be noticed.

B
Self
B player
A
Team aggregate
A player
avg 2.63 / 3

Master 9-box

Aggregated across all grids, left-axis vs right-axis scores.

AggregatedSelf-assessment
Hidden Gem
Future Leader
Top Talent
Quiet Contributor
Solid All-Rounder
Strong Performer
Needs Support
Developing
Reliable Doer
Aggregated placement
Solid All-Rounder
Left-axis avg 2.41 · Right-axis avg 2.26
Self-assessed placement
Strong Performer
Left-axis avg 2.60 · Right-axis avg 2.30

Top strengths

Potential
2.6
Delivery
2.6
Performance
2.5

Main development areas

Self-Awareness
1.7
Communication
2.0
Conduct
2.0

Relationship-group breakdown

GroupPerformanceBehaviourTrustLeadership/InfluenceGrowth Potential
Manager(1)2.502.052.302.352.30
Peer(4)2.552.152.352.402.35
Direct Report(3)2.601.902.302.302.25

Grid by grid

ReviewersSelf-assessment
1. Performance × Potential
Potential →
Potential Gem
High Potential
Star
Inconsistent Player
Core Player
High Performer
Risk
Average Performer
Solid Performer
Performance →
Performance: 2.5Potential: 2.6Self: 3/3
▸Reviewer comments (3) · anonymous
  • High Performer
    "Consistently delivers high-quality outcomes and is clearly ready for stretch work."
  • High Performer
    "Strong recent results, with a track record of taking on new challenges."
  • Star
    "A standout, both delivering today and demonstrating real upside for the future."
2. Impact × Conduct
Conduct →
Values Champion
Trusted Contributor
Role Model
Quiet Contributor
Reliable Operator
Driven Achiever
Concern
Low Impact
Strong Output, Watch Conduct
Impact →
Impact: 2.5Conduct: 2.0Self: 3/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Reliable Operator
    "Reliable contributor, behaviours are mostly on point."
  • Driven Achiever
    "Drives results and is generally aligned with our values, though can be blunt under pressure."
3. Delivery × Collaboration
Collaboration →
Glue, Low Output
Connector
Team Multiplier
Friendly but Light
Steady Team Player
Strong Partner
Disengaged
Lone Deliverer
Heads-Down Producer
Delivery →
Delivery: 2.6Collaboration: 2.2Self: 3/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Steady Team Player
    "Dependable. Could lean further into proactive collaboration."
  • Strong Partner
    "Ships work consistently and partners well with the wider team."
4. Trust × Capability
Capability →
Trusted Voice
Trusted Specialist
Trusted Authority
Trusted Learner
Dependable Pro
Go-To Expert
Low Trust, Low Skill
Capable but Unproven
Skilled, Trust Gap
Trust →
Trust: 2.3Capability: 2.5Self: 2/3
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Dependable Pro
    "Trusted by peers and demonstrates solid technical capability."
  • Go-To Expert
    "Go-to person on several topics; trust is well earned."
5. Role Expectations × Behavioural Standards
Behavioural Standards →
Culture Carrier
Strong All-Rounder
Exemplary
On-Brand, Under-Delivering
Meeting the Bar
Above the Bar
Off Track
Doing the Job, Off-Brand
Delivering, Behaviour Risk
Role Expectations →
Role Expectations: 2.5Behavioural Standards: 2.0Self: 3/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Meeting the Bar
    "Doing the job well; behaviours need slight polish in tense moments."
  • Above the Bar
    "Clearly meets role expectations and behaves in line with our standards."
6. Strategic Thinking × Execution
Execution →
Strategist
Strategic Doer
Visionary Builder
Thinker, Slow to Act
Balanced Operator
Strong Executor
Stuck
Doer, No Direction
Executor
Strategic Thinking →
Strategic Thinking: 2.5Execution: 2.5Self: 2/3
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Executor
    "Strong executor, would benefit from stepping back to think bigger picture."
  • Strong Executor
    "Thinks strategically and follows through on execution."
7. Ownership × Follow-Through
Follow-Through →
Owns the Outcome
Sees It Through
Total Ownership
Owns It, Drops It
Reliable Owner
Strong Closer
Avoids Accountability
Starts, Doesn't Finish
Closes What Others Start
Ownership →
Ownership: 2.5Follow-Through: 2.4Self: 3/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Reliable Owner
    "Reliable owner; occasionally needs nudging on follow-through."
  • Strong Closer
    "Owns problems end-to-end and closes the loop."
8. Communication × Self-Awareness
Self-Awareness →
Reflective Listener
Insightful Voice
Inspires Others
Aware, Quiet
Clear and Self-Aware
Compelling Communicator
Unclear, Unaware
Talks, Misreads Room
Heard, Not Self-Aware
Communication →
Communication: 2.0Self-Awareness: 1.7Self: 2/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Talks, Misreads Room
    "Could read the room better in group settings."
  • Clear and Self-Aware
    "Communicates clearly and is generally open to feedback."
9. Quality × Consistency
Consistency →
High Bar When On
High Standard
Best in Class
Steady, Average
Consistently Good
Consistently Excellent
Unreliable
Sometimes Sharp
Polished but Patchy
Quality →
Quality: 2.5Consistency: 2.3Self: 3/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Consistently Good
    "Strong standards, occasional inconsistency under workload."
  • Consistently Excellent
    "Quality of work is consistently high."
10. Influence × Credibility
Credibility →
Quiet Authority
Trusted Influencer
Influential Leader
Believable, Quiet
Respected Voice
Persuasive Pro
Overlooked
Heard, Not Believed
Loud, Low Trust
Influence →
Influence: 2.3Credibility: 2.4Self: 2/2
▸Reviewer comments (2) · anonymous
  • Believable, Quiet
    "Believable and quietly effective; could speak up more often."
  • Respected Voice
    "Respected voice in the team; influence is growing."